Outline:
A. Project Title
B. Author Complete Name
C. Affiliation
D. Abstract
E. Author Declaration
1. Deep Awareness (of) I
2. Intention of the Project Activity
F. Introduction
(include detailed Initial (thinking about the problem)
G. Methods & Procedures
(include Idealization, Instruction (set))
H. Results & Discussion
I. Acknowledgments
J. (References) Literature Cited ___________________________
Outline Explanation:
A. Project Title
Provide a concise and descriptive title reflecting the report’s scope and content.
B. Author Complete Name
Include the full name of the author(s).
C. Affiliation
Specify the institutional or organizational affiliation(s) of the author(s).
D. Abstract
Summarize the report in 150–250 words, highlighting the objectives, methodology, key findings, and conclusions.
E. Author Declaration
1. Deep Awareness (of) I
Articulate the author’s conscious understanding of the role of self-awareness in the project, emphasizing remembrance of The One and Only.
2. Intention of the Project Activity
Clearly state the purpose and objectives of the project or study, aligned with a higher purpose and ethical considerations.
F. Introduction
Provide background and context for the study or project. Clearly define the problem or issue being addressed.
Initial Thinking (about the Problem):
Analyze the problem systematically. Highlight previous research or existing gaps that motivate the work.
G. Methods & Procedures
Describe the methodology in detail, ensuring replicability.
Idealization:
Explain the assumptions, models, and simplifications used to conceptualize an ideal solution.
Instruction (Set):
Outline the procedural steps, including tools, algorithms, and protocols. Emphasize continuous refinement through interpretation and iteration.
H. Results & Discussion
Present the findings in a structured manner, using tables, figures, and graphs where necessary. Discuss the results in relation to the problem and existing literature, emphasizing insights and implications.
I. Conclusion, Closing Remarks, Recommendations
Summarize the key outcomes and their significance. Offer actionable recommendations or next steps for further work.
J. Acknowledgments
Recognize contributions and support from individuals, institutions, or funding sources.
K. (References) Literature Cited
List all sources cited in the report in a standard citation format.
L. Appendices
Include supplementary material such as data sets, calculations, or detailed protocols.
___________________________
Contoh (Petunjuk) :
A. Judul Proyek
Desain dan Analisis Sistem Hidraulik atau Pneumatik Menggunakan Kerangka DAI5
B. Nama Lengkap Penulis
Nama Lengkap
C. Afiliasi
Departemen Teknik Mesin, Universitas Contoh
D. Abstrak
Makalah ini menyajikan pendekatan sistematis untuk mendesain dan menganalisis sistem hidraulik atau pneumatik menggunakan kerangka DAI5. Metodologi ini mengintegrasikan kesadaran sadar, niat, dan prinsip-prinsip teknik yang ketat untuk mengatasi tantangan sistem. Studi kasus menyoroti penerapan kerangka ini untuk mengoptimalkan kinerja, keandalan, dan keberlanjutan.
E. Deklarasi Penulis
1. Deep Awareness (of) I
Menyadari peran sadar desainer dalam menyelaraskan keputusan teknis dengan ingatan kepada Tuhan Yang Maha Esa. Menekankan tanggung jawab etis dan komitmen terhadap hasil yang bermanfaat.
2. Niat Kegiatan Proyek
Mengembangkan dan menganalisis sistem hidraulik atau pneumatik yang efisien dan andal yang memenuhi persyaratan fungsional sambil mematuhi prinsip keberlanjutan dan desain etis.
F. Pendahuluan
Sistem hidraulik dan pneumatik memainkan peran penting di berbagai industri karena efisiensi dan adaptabilitasnya. Meskipun penggunaannya luas, tantangan tetap ada dalam mengoptimalkan kinerja, meminimalkan kehilangan energi, dan memastikan keberlanjutan.
- Pemikiran Awal (tentang Masalah):
– **Menganalisis Masalah Secara Sistematis:**
Mengevaluasi ketidakefisienan dalam sistem yang ada, seperti kehilangan energi, masalah keandalan, dan biaya operasional. Pastikan pemahaman yang jelas tentang bagaimana hal ini memengaruhi kinerja sistem.
– **Soroti Penelitian Sebelumnya dan Kesenjangan yang Ada:**
Rangkum studi tentang sistem hidraulik dan pneumatik, dengan penekanan pada area di mana solusi saat ini kurang memadai, seperti keterbatasan efisiensi energi atau adaptabilitas terhadap kebutuhan modern.
– **Mengurai Masalah:**
Rinci isu umum ketidakefisienan sistem menjadi tantangan spesifik, seperti mengurangi penurunan tekanan dalam sirkuit hidraulik atau mengoptimalkan aliran udara dalam sistem pneumatik. Berikan contoh untuk mengilustrasikan tantangan ini.
– **Dekonstruksi ke Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar:**
Pecah operasi sistem ke prinsip-prinsip dasar, seperti dinamika fluida, termodinamika, dan teori kontrol, yang menjadi dasar untuk idealisasi.
– **Analisis State-of-the-Art:**
Tinjau kemajuan dalam teknologi hidraulik dan pneumatik, seperti aktuator cerdas dan sistem pemulihan energi. Diskusikan masalah yang belum terselesaikan dan justifikasi kebutuhan pendekatan baru.
G. Metode & Langkah-langkah Solusi
- Idealisasi:
– Kembangkan model sistem yang disederhanakan dengan mempertimbangkan asumsi seperti operasi steady-state dan kebocoran yang dapat diabaikan. Justifikasi asumsi ini dengan referensi standar dan literatur yang relevan.
– Gunakan prinsip-prinsip teoretis, seperti persamaan Bernoulli untuk sistem hidraulik atau hukum Boyle untuk sistem pneumatik, untuk memandu desain.
2. Instruksi (Set):
– Rincikan proses desain langkah demi langkah:
1. Tentukan persyaratan sistem (misalnya, kapasitas beban, kecepatan, dan presisi). 2. Pilih komponen (misalnya, pompa, katup, aktuator) berdasarkan model idealisasi.
3. Simulasikan kinerja sistem menggunakan perangkat lunak seperti MATLAB atau ANSYS.
4. Validasi desain terhadap kendala praktis, termasuk biaya dan kemampuan manufaktur.
– Tekankan proses iteratif untuk menyempurnakan desain berdasarkan hasil simulasi dan umpan balik.
H. Hasil dan Diskusi
Sajikan desain sistem hidraulik atau pneumatik yang dioptimalkan, termasuk:
– Metrik kinerja, seperti efisiensi energi dan keandalan.
– Perbandingan dengan desain tradisional, menyoroti perbaikan.
– Wawasan dari hasil simulasi dan implikasi praktis.
– Diskusi tentang keterbatasan, seperti asumsi dalam model idealisasi.
I. Kesimpulan, Penutup, Rekomendasi
Ringkas kontribusi kerangka kerja terhadap desain sistem, menekankan manfaat integrasi prinsip DAI5. Rekomendasikan studi lanjutan tentang material atau strategi kontrol canggih untuk meningkatkan kinerja sistem.
J. Ucapan Terima Kasih
Terima kasih kepada rekan kerja, lembaga pendanaan, dan mentor yang mendukung pekerjaan ini.
K. Referensi yang Dikutip
Cantumkan semua karya yang dikutip, seperti buku teks, artikel jurnal, dan standar, dengan format sesuai APA atau gaya relevan lainnya.
L. Lampiran
Sertakan perhitungan rinci, data simulasi, atau diagram desain tambahan untuk mendukung teks utama.
___________________________
The 33 DAI5 Implementation Evaluation Criteria
___________________________
I. Deep Awareness of I (DAI)
1. Consciousness of Purpose: Reflects understanding of the Creator’s role in shaping the case study context.
2. Self-awareness: Demonstrates awareness of personal biases, assumptions, and roles in the analysis.
3. Ethical Considerations: Includes moral and ethical implications in addressing the case study.
4. Integration of CCIT (Cara Cerdas Ingat Tuhan): Maintains remembrance of The Creator throughout the essay.
5. Critical Reflection: Shows depth in connecting technical solutions to broader spiritual and societal impacts.
6. Continuum of Awareness: Evidence of uninterrupted and progressive conscious analysis.
II. Intention
7. Clarity of Intent: States a clear and purposeful intention aligned with the ultimate goal of the Creator’s recognition.
8. Alignment of Objectives: Aligns case study objectives with higher values and universal principles.
9. Relevance of Intent: Ensures the intention addresses real-world engineering needs effectively.
10. Sustainability Focus: Intends solutions that consider long-term environmental, societal, and economic impacts.
11. Focus on Quality: Demonstrates a conscious intention to prioritize reliability, accuracy, and precision.
III. Initial Thinking (about the Problem)
12. Problem Understanding: Clearly identifies and describes the engineering problem.
13. Stakeholder Awareness: Considers perspectives of all stakeholders impacted by the problem or solution.
14. Contextual Analysis: Places the problem within a relevant physical, social, and technical context.
15. Root Cause Analysis: Identifies underlying causes, not just symptoms of the problem.
16. Relevance of Analysis: Ensures the problem-solving process is grounded in practical and applicable insights.
17. Use of Data and Evidence: Employs credible, accurate, and sufficient data to support problem understanding.
IV. Idealization
18. Assumption Clarity: States all assumptions explicitly and justifies their relevance.
19. Creativity and Innovation: Proposes unique or unconventional idealized solutions while adhering to realism.
20. Physical Realism: Ensures the idealization adheres to physical laws and engineering principles.
21. Alignment with Intent: Ensures idealization aligns with the initial intention and overarching goals.
22. Scalability and Adaptability: Considers whether the idealized solution is scalable and adaptable to different contexts.
23. Simplicity and Elegance: Proposes solutions that are efficient, simple, and elegant while solving complex problems.
V. Instruction (Set)
24. Clarity of Steps: Outlines each step of the solution process clearly and logically.
25. Comprehensiveness: Includes all relevant aspects of the solution, leaving no gaps.
26. Physical Interpretation: Explains the physical meaning of all numerical results or design decisions.
27. Error Minimization: Includes procedures to reduce errors in solution implementation.
28. Verification and Validation: Provides methods for verifying and validating the solution.
29. Iterative Approach: Demonstrates readiness to iterate and refine the solution if needed.
30. Sustainability Integration: Considers sustainable practices within the solution execution.
31. Communication Effectiveness: Presents instructions in a way that is understandable and actionable by others.
32. Alignment with the DAI5 Framework: Maintains coherence with all preceding DAI5 steps.
33. Documentation Quality: Provides clear, complete, and professional documentation of the solution.
