I. Deep Awareness (of) I
1. Consciousness of Purpose: Reflects understanding of the Creator’s role in shaping the case study context.
2. Self-awareness: Demonstrates awareness of personal biases, assumptions, and roles in the analysis.
3. Ethical Considerations: Includes moral and ethical implications in addressing the case study.
4. Integration of CCIT (Cara Cerdas Ingat Tuhan): Maintains remembrance of The Creator throughout the essay.
5. Critical Reflection: Shows depth in connecting technical solutions to broader spiritual and societal impacts.
6. Continuum of Awareness: Evidence of uninterrupted and progressive conscious analysis.
II. Intention
7. Clarity of Intent: States a clear and purposeful intention aligned with the ultimate goal of the Creator’s recognition.
8. Alignment of Objectives: Aligns case study objectives with higher values and universal principles.
9. Relevance of Intent: Ensures the intention addresses real-world engineering needs effectively.
10. Sustainability Focus: Intends solutions that consider long-term environmental, societal, and economic impacts.
11. Focus on Quality: Demonstrates a conscious intention to prioritize reliability, accuracy, and precision.
III. Initial Thinking (about the Problem)
12. Problem Understanding: Clearly identifies and describes the engineering problem.
13. Stakeholder Awareness: Considers perspectives of all stakeholders impacted by the problem or solution.
14. Contextual Analysis: Places the problem within a relevant physical, social, and technical context.
15. Root Cause Analysis: Identifies underlying causes, not just symptoms of the problem.
16. Relevance of Analysis: Ensures the problem-solving process is grounded in practical and applicable insights.
17. Use of Data and Evidence: Employs credible, accurate, and sufficient data to support problem understanding.
IV. Idealization
18. Assumption Clarity: States all assumptions explicitly and justifies their relevance.
19. Creativity and Innovation: Proposes unique or unconventional idealized solutions while adhering to realism.
20. Physical Realism: Ensures the idealization adheres to physical laws and engineering principles.
21. Alignment with Intent: Ensures idealization aligns with the initial intention and overarching goals.
22. Scalability and Adaptability: Considers whether the idealized solution is scalable and adaptable to different contexts.
23. Simplicity and Elegance: Proposes solutions that are efficient, simple, and elegant while solving complex problems.
V. Instruction (Set)
24. Clarity of Steps: Outlines each step of the solution process clearly and logically.
25. Comprehensiveness: Includes all relevant aspects of the solution, leaving no gaps.
26. Physical Interpretation: Explains the physical meaning of all numerical results or design decisions.
27. Error Minimization: Includes procedures to reduce errors in solution implementation.
28. Verification and Validation: Provides methods for verifying and validating the solution.
29. Iterative Approach: Demonstrates readiness to iterate and refine the solution if needed.
30. Sustainability Integration: Considers sustainable practices within the solution execution.
31. Communication Effectiveness: Presents instructions in a way that is understandable and actionable by others.
32. Alignment with the DAI5 Framework: Maintains coherence with all preceding DAI5 steps.
33. Documentation Quality: Provides clear, complete, and professional documentation of the solution.
